Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

South Dakota Case Commentaries

Jones and the Clear-and-Convincing Public-Interest Test: No Automatic Expungement After Acquittal in South Dakota

Jones and the Clear-and-Convincing Public-Interest Test: No Automatic Expungement After Acquittal in South Dakota

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Jones and the Clear-and-Convincing Public-Interest Test: No Automatic Expungement After Acquittal in South Dakota Introduction In Record Expungement of Jones, 2025 S.D. 54, the Supreme Court of South...
No Appropriation Without Exclusive Control: Shoreline-Connected Canals Do Not Require Water Appropriation Permits under South Dakota Law

No Appropriation Without Exclusive Control: Shoreline-Connected Canals Do Not Require Water Appropriation Permits under South Dakota Law

Date: Sep 25, 2025
No Appropriation Without Exclusive Control: Shoreline-Connected Canals Do Not Require Water Appropriation Permits under South Dakota Law Case: McCook Lake Recreation Area v. Dakota Bay, LLC, 2025...
Actual Value Controls Over Productivity Schedules: No Certified Appraisal Required, and Agencies Must Find Market Value

Actual Value Controls Over Productivity Schedules: No Certified Appraisal Required, and Agencies Must Find Market Value

Date: Sep 19, 2025
Actual Value Controls Over Productivity Schedules: No Certified Appraisal Required, and Agencies Must Find Market Value Introduction In Pallansch v. Roberts County, 2025 S.D. 52, the Supreme Court of...
Parental Primacy Reaffirmed: No Non‑Parent Visitation Without Rebutting the Parental Presumption; ICWA Applies to Third‑Party Custody and the Duty to Inquire Rests with the Court

Parental Primacy Reaffirmed: No Non‑Parent Visitation Without Rebutting the Parental Presumption; ICWA Applies to Third‑Party Custody and the Duty to Inquire Rests with the Court

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Parental Primacy Reaffirmed: No Non‑Parent Visitation Without Rebutting the Parental Presumption; ICWA Applies to Third‑Party Custody and the Duty to Inquire Rests with the Court Introduction In...
State v. Bradshaw: South Dakota Clarifies “Unnecessary Delay” Dismissals under SDCL 23A-44-3 and Distinguishes the 180-Day Rule

State v. Bradshaw: South Dakota Clarifies “Unnecessary Delay” Dismissals under SDCL 23A-44-3 and Distinguishes the 180-Day Rule

Date: Aug 21, 2025
State v. Bradshaw: South Dakota Clarifies “Unnecessary Delay” Dismissals under SDCL 23A-44-3 and Distinguishes the 180-Day Rule Court: Supreme Court of South Dakota | Citation: 2025 S.D. 48 | Date:...
Successive Leases Stand Alone: South Dakota Supreme Court Holds “Then Existing Mortgage” Means the Current (Refinanced) Debt and Rejects Carry-Forward of Prior Reserve Obligations

Successive Leases Stand Alone: South Dakota Supreme Court Holds “Then Existing Mortgage” Means the Current (Refinanced) Debt and Rejects Carry-Forward of Prior Reserve Obligations

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Successive Leases Stand Alone: South Dakota Supreme Court Holds “Then Existing Mortgage” Means the Current (Refinanced) Debt and Rejects Carry-Forward of Prior Reserve Obligations Introduction In...
Interrogatory Admissions Can Establish “Damage” and Trigger a Jury Question on Constructive Notice Under SDCL 31‑32‑10; Statutory Authorization Bars Municipal Nuisance Claims — Commentary on Mahmoudi v. City of Spearfish, 2025 S.D. 49

Interrogatory Admissions Can Establish “Damage” and Trigger a Jury Question on Constructive Notice Under SDCL 31‑32‑10; Statutory Authorization Bars Municipal Nuisance Claims — Commentary on Mahmoudi v. City of Spearfish, 2025 S.D. 49

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Interrogatory Admissions Can Establish “Damage” and Trigger a Jury Question on Constructive Notice Under SDCL 31‑32‑10; Statutory Authorization Bars Municipal Nuisance Claims Introduction This...
Lefors v. Lefors: Stacking Per‑Violation Civil Penalties and No Show‑Cause Requirement for Visitation-Order Sanctions Under SDCL 25‑4A‑5

Lefors v. Lefors: Stacking Per‑Violation Civil Penalties and No Show‑Cause Requirement for Visitation-Order Sanctions Under SDCL 25‑4A‑5

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Lefors v. Lefors: Stacking Per‑Violation Civil Penalties and No Show‑Cause Requirement for Visitation-Order Sanctions Under SDCL 25‑4A‑5 Introduction In Lefors v. Lefors, 2025 S.D. 46, the Supreme...
State v. Anderson: No Isomer Distinction—l‑Methamphetamine Is a Schedule II Substance; Broad Trial-Court Discretion Over Daubert Hearings and Expert Disclosures

State v. Anderson: No Isomer Distinction—l‑Methamphetamine Is a Schedule II Substance; Broad Trial-Court Discretion Over Daubert Hearings and Expert Disclosures

Date: Aug 14, 2025
State v. Anderson: No Isomer Distinction—l‑Methamphetamine Is a Schedule II Substance; Broad Trial-Court Discretion Over Daubert Hearings and Expert Disclosures Court: Supreme Court of South Dakota...
Anderson Industries v. Thermal Intelligence: Clarifying UCC Installment-Contract Breach and Flexible Contract Formation Under § 2-204

Anderson Industries v. Thermal Intelligence: Clarifying UCC Installment-Contract Breach and Flexible Contract Formation Under § 2-204

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Anderson Industries v. Thermal Intelligence: Clarifying UCC Installment-Contract Breach and Flexible Contract Formation Under § 2-204 Court: Supreme Court of South Dakota Citation: 2025 S.D. 47 Date:...
Best-Interests Check Required for No-Contact Provisions in Domestic Abuse Protection Orders Involving Children; Laser Targeting Can Establish “Fear of Imminent Harm” under SDCL 25-10

Best-Interests Check Required for No-Contact Provisions in Domestic Abuse Protection Orders Involving Children; Laser Targeting Can Establish “Fear of Imminent Harm” under SDCL 25-10

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Best-Interests Check Required for No-Contact Provisions in Domestic Abuse Protection Orders Involving Children; Laser Targeting Can Establish “Fear of Imminent Harm” under SDCL 25-10 Case: Wagner v....
South Dakota Supreme Court bars punitive damages for breach of the UCC implied covenant of good faith; Rule 50(b) motion preserved new ground when unopposed — Goldenview Ready-Mix, LLC v. Grangaard Construction, Inc., 2025 S.D. 43

South Dakota Supreme Court bars punitive damages for breach of the UCC implied covenant of good faith; Rule 50(b) motion preserved new ground when unopposed — Goldenview Ready-Mix, LLC v. Grangaard Construction, Inc., 2025 S.D. 43

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Punitive damages are unavailable for breach of the UCC implied covenant of good faith; unobjected Rule 50(b) motion preserves new legal grounds Introduction In Goldenview Ready-Mix, LLC v. Grangaard...
Voluntary Workers’ Compensation Payments Do Not Shift Burden or Trigger SDCL 62-7-33 Review: Claimant Retains Burden to Prove Major Contributing Cause

Voluntary Workers’ Compensation Payments Do Not Shift Burden or Trigger SDCL 62-7-33 Review: Claimant Retains Burden to Prove Major Contributing Cause

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Voluntary Workers’ Compensation Payments Do Not Shift Burden or Trigger SDCL 62-7-33 Review: Claimant Retains Burden to Prove Major Contributing Cause Case: Pham v. Smithfield Foods, 2025 S.D. 41...
Absolute Privilege Under SDCL 20-11-5(2) Extends to Tortious Interference and Covers Tribal Administrative Proceedings; Pleading Defect Cured by Implied Consent

Absolute Privilege Under SDCL 20-11-5(2) Extends to Tortious Interference and Covers Tribal Administrative Proceedings; Pleading Defect Cured by Implied Consent

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Absolute Privilege Under SDCL 20-11-5(2) Extends to Tortious Interference and Covers Tribal Administrative Proceedings; Pleading Defect Cured by Implied Consent Introduction In Rowe v. Rowe, 2025...
Death of a Partner Triggers Accrual; Harmless-Error Tolerance for Premature Limitations Motions: Commentary on Nelson v. Tinkcom, 2025 S.D. 42

Death of a Partner Triggers Accrual; Harmless-Error Tolerance for Premature Limitations Motions: Commentary on Nelson v. Tinkcom, 2025 S.D. 42

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Death of a Partner Triggers Accrual; Harmless-Error Tolerance for Premature Limitations Motions: Commentary on Nelson v. Tinkcom, 2025 S.D. 42 Introduction In Nelson v. Tinkcom, the Supreme Court of...
Alexander v. Estate of Hobart: ROFRs Conditioned on USFS Permit Issuance Are Enforceable; Market/Arbitration-Based ROFRs Are Not Unreasonable Restraints

Alexander v. Estate of Hobart: ROFRs Conditioned on USFS Permit Issuance Are Enforceable; Market/Arbitration-Based ROFRs Are Not Unreasonable Restraints

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Alexander v. Estate of Hobart: ROFRs Conditioned on USFS Permit Issuance Are Enforceable; Market/Arbitration-Based ROFRs Are Not Unreasonable Restraints Court: Supreme Court of South Dakota Citation:...
Actual Physical Residency at Time of Receipt Required to Invoke South Dakota’s Anti‑Spam Statute: Commentary on Lapin v. Zeetogroup (2025 S.D. 36)

Actual Physical Residency at Time of Receipt Required to Invoke South Dakota’s Anti‑Spam Statute: Commentary on Lapin v. Zeetogroup (2025 S.D. 36)

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Actual Physical Residency at Time of Receipt Required to Invoke South Dakota’s Anti‑Spam Statute: Lapin v. Zeetogroup (2025 S.D. 36) Court: Supreme Court of South Dakota | Date: July 16, 2025 |...
Causation Required for Juvenile Restitution: South Dakota Aligns Delinquency Restitution with Adult Standard in In re Interest of J.W. (2025 S.D. 38)

Causation Required for Juvenile Restitution: South Dakota Aligns Delinquency Restitution with Adult Standard in In re Interest of J.W. (2025 S.D. 38)

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Causation Required for Juvenile Restitution: South Dakota Aligns Delinquency Restitution with Adult Standard in In re Interest of J.W. (2025 S.D. 38) Introduction In In the Interest of J.W., 2025...
Two-Year Medical Malpractice Repose Means Two Calendar Years Ending the Day Before the Anniversary: Paulsen v. Avera McKennan

Two-Year Medical Malpractice Repose Means Two Calendar Years Ending the Day Before the Anniversary: Paulsen v. Avera McKennan

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Two-Year Medical Malpractice Repose Means Two Calendar Years Ending the Day Before the Anniversary: Paulsen v. Avera McKennan Introduction In Paulsen v. Avera McKennan, 2025 S.D. 37, the South Dakota...
Rule 41(b) Dismissals Must Be Factor‑Guided; “Record Activity” Under SDCL 15‑11‑11 Includes Verifiable Informal Discovery and Counsel Communications; Workplace Personal Service by a Nonparty Elector Is Valid — Olson v. Huron Regional Medical Center, Inc., 2025 S.D. 34 (S.D. 2025)

Rule 41(b) Dismissals Must Be Factor‑Guided; “Record Activity” Under SDCL 15‑11‑11 Includes Verifiable Informal Discovery and Counsel Communications; Workplace Personal Service by a Nonparty Elector Is Valid — Olson v. Huron Regional Medical Center, Inc., 2025 S.D. 34 (S.D. 2025)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Rule 41(b) Dismissals Must Be Factor‑Guided; “Record Activity” Under SDCL 15‑11‑11 Includes Verifiable Informal Discovery and Counsel Communications; Workplace Personal Service by a Nonparty Elector...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert